All the assessment tasks for physiology, save the exam, are complete! No more UNE physiology assignments for the semester, year and rest of my life! Hah! I think I'll celebrate by driving 400 kms for a piss up! But for now, TEQUILA!
PG Out.
Thursday, October 09, 2008
Tuesday, October 07, 2008
The Perfect Crime
So the NCIS ad has 'This killer isn't going to stop at 1' And I was thinking "Well of course he's not going to stop at ONE. They'd NEVER catch him/her if they just stopped at ONE. Who the hell are they Goran from Criminal Intent? Columbo? Noooooo the killer has to at least kill two, preferably the main suspect to avoid the investigators going down the wrong path, or main witness that we never suspected was the REAL killer. Erm. Don't ask how that works.
ANYWAY so I was musing, if the killer stopped at one they'd almost certainly get away. AND if they never killed at all they'd be CERTAIN of not going to be caught. Ah-ha! So I'm going down in history as the world's LEAST prolific serial killer, with a grand total of zero victims. Maw ha ha ha! The perfect crime!
And Homer's got a point. No man should outlive his fictional wizard. I mean Gandalf survived dammit! Poor Dumbledoor. Er Greystash.
*******COHESION ERROR*******
This post contains thought trains logical to the thinker but inconsistent with an outside observer's following. Please adjust
What the hell is Denoso doing on an aircraft carrier?
*********OUT OF CHEESE ERROR********
PG Out. (Of cheese).
ANYWAY so I was musing, if the killer stopped at one they'd almost certainly get away. AND if they never killed at all they'd be CERTAIN of not going to be caught. Ah-ha! So I'm going down in history as the world's LEAST prolific serial killer, with a grand total of zero victims. Maw ha ha ha! The perfect crime!
And Homer's got a point. No man should outlive his fictional wizard. I mean Gandalf survived dammit! Poor Dumbledoor. Er Greystash.
*******COHESION ERROR*******
This post contains thought trains logical to the thinker but inconsistent with an outside observer's following. Please adjust
What the hell is Denoso doing on an aircraft carrier?
*********OUT OF CHEESE ERROR********
PG Out. (Of cheese).
Sunday, October 05, 2008
Saturday Night in St. Kilda
Was fucking awesome. Finally found where all the lookers in Melbourne are at. And we only sampled all the bars down Fitzroy St. Next weekend however its sampling the darts cabaret. Looks like I'll be trading Fitzroy St. kisses for Banjo's licks. Hmmmm.
PG Out.
PG Out.
Sunday, September 28, 2008
........
Viva la Vida lyrically from Coldplay seems to sum up the feelings at the moment, though musically Metallica's Lowman's Lyric captures the mood better. Another scotch, some more laments in the key of G on the guitar and then bed.
PG Out.
Friday, September 26, 2008
Saturday, September 20, 2008
Bye Bye Stokesy
Probably nothing pisses off a coach more then a player who doesn't lift because he's unaware he's down in the first place. Now Chappy Chap looks like a monte for returning and Bomber has given Varcoe, Kelly and Woosher immunity cards (well technically they themselves EARNT those immunity cards by their performances Fri night) there seems to be only one candidate left, Stokes.
His comments on the gfc website do nothing for his cause. Firstly he highlights how important Chapman is for the forward line, talk about digging your own grave! Secondly his comments intimated that Chapman gets others to lift by verbally grabbing them round the scruff of the neck and giving a yank. He also intimated that some in the forward line needed that.
It seems like Stokes is so busy looking at other's flaws he's forgotten to look at himself.
I mean even if Stokes wasn't under performing the fact both him and Chapman are marking small forwards argues that for team balance he's a candidate for omission given that Chap can play midfield and Stokes cannot. Which is something the fella should work on really, building up that tank to give another midfield option.
However just look at the stats. The only other players with less disposals then Stokes were:
Blake, who still had 11 hit outs and is an unquestionable inclusion.
Rook, who booted more fucking goals then Stokes despite playing in defence and is ten times as hard
Lonergan who suffered from the scragging, poor supply and a couple of slip overs. Lonergan ran 110m at one point after a turn-over from his slip over, laid a tackle that resulted in turn-over in Geelong favour for the ball to be run down for a Cats goal. His endevaour could not be questioned last night, as opposed to Stokes. Lonergan is only a chance of omission if Bomber believes that the forward line is too tall. Also, Tom is in his first year and does display some of the first year jitters of a rookie playing finals. But honestly I think dropping Lonergan would MAKE the team unbalanced rather then correct an imbalance.
So both from Dad's perspective, my perspective now the old man has brought it to my attention, and the disposal count Stokes may be the shock exclusion come the Grand Final. I probably wasn't fully convinced until his interview comments which contrast remarkedly from the usual Cat's line of humbleness and perspective. Seems to me Stokes has lost his perspective. One bloke that doesn't lose perspective is Bomber. Look out Stokesy!
His comments on the gfc website do nothing for his cause. Firstly he highlights how important Chapman is for the forward line, talk about digging your own grave! Secondly his comments intimated that Chapman gets others to lift by verbally grabbing them round the scruff of the neck and giving a yank. He also intimated that some in the forward line needed that.
It seems like Stokes is so busy looking at other's flaws he's forgotten to look at himself.
I mean even if Stokes wasn't under performing the fact both him and Chapman are marking small forwards argues that for team balance he's a candidate for omission given that Chap can play midfield and Stokes cannot. Which is something the fella should work on really, building up that tank to give another midfield option.
However just look at the stats. The only other players with less disposals then Stokes were:
Blake, who still had 11 hit outs and is an unquestionable inclusion.
Rook, who booted more fucking goals then Stokes despite playing in defence and is ten times as hard
Lonergan who suffered from the scragging, poor supply and a couple of slip overs. Lonergan ran 110m at one point after a turn-over from his slip over, laid a tackle that resulted in turn-over in Geelong favour for the ball to be run down for a Cats goal. His endevaour could not be questioned last night, as opposed to Stokes. Lonergan is only a chance of omission if Bomber believes that the forward line is too tall. Also, Tom is in his first year and does display some of the first year jitters of a rookie playing finals. But honestly I think dropping Lonergan would MAKE the team unbalanced rather then correct an imbalance.
So both from Dad's perspective, my perspective now the old man has brought it to my attention, and the disposal count Stokes may be the shock exclusion come the Grand Final. I probably wasn't fully convinced until his interview comments which contrast remarkedly from the usual Cat's line of humbleness and perspective. Seems to me Stokes has lost his perspective. One bloke that doesn't lose perspective is Bomber. Look out Stokesy!
One Day More
One last game left for the Cats 2008 campaign! You fucking ripper! And Travis Varcoe FINALLY did something! In fact multiple somethings going from 4 possessions midway through first half to 18 by game's end. Constantly presenting across half forward he gave the ever-toiling Ablett a consistent option especially in that last term when few from either team had run left. The Dogs tried for 4 quarters, throwing everything at us but we still withstood and still won by 5 goals. Bring on the Grand Final!
Geeeeelooonnng!
Carn Catters!
PG Out
Geeeeelooonnng!
Carn Catters!
PG Out
Thursday, September 18, 2008
No Comment
From now on, in issues to do with PG's life, I think I shall answer: No comment when queried.
Because it seems after asking where I'm going to move or what I'm going to do after the degree, etc etc people take this as carte blanche for giving their misinformed, illinformed, or just plain stupid opinions on these subjects. No thankee Killick!
Take renting a flat. "Waaeewaeeewaaaeee Melbourne rental market is tight" is the oft cited warning. Well there's so many fucking flats in the areas I'm looking at it's too much. My notepad is full. Shove that in your pipe and smoke it naysayers!
I'm off to bed big game tomorrow.
PG Out
Because it seems after asking where I'm going to move or what I'm going to do after the degree, etc etc people take this as carte blanche for giving their misinformed, illinformed, or just plain stupid opinions on these subjects. No thankee Killick!
Take renting a flat. "Waaeewaeeewaaaeee Melbourne rental market is tight" is the oft cited warning. Well there's so many fucking flats in the areas I'm looking at it's too much. My notepad is full. Shove that in your pipe and smoke it naysayers!
I'm off to bed big game tomorrow.
PG Out
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
